RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 27, 2015 at 2:58 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2015 at 3:02 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(June 27, 2015 at 2:42 pm)Neimenovic Wrote:*Emphasis mine*(June 27, 2015 at 2:30 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I said he was on record defending a statutory rapist.....
....when he was objecting calling that guy a pedophile.
I read the thread you linked. Nothing Esq said was in defense of what Milk did. The issue he took was clearly with calling him a pedophile.
But why am I expecting you to be intellectually honest again? Silly me.
Read carefully...
(May 31, 2014 at 10:59 am)Esquilax Wrote: 16 is the age of consent where I am. Bit shaky, but I don't find this particularly objectionable on its own, and certainly not enough to label the guy a pedophile. Seems like classic theistic stretching beyond their means to me.*Again emphasis mine*
In case you have trouble comprehending what he's saying, and it seems you do, he's stating that he doesn't have a problem with a thirty-something year old having sex with a 16 year old kid, which was AGAINST THE LAW in this scenario..... statutory rape.
Also, I wasn't the one that brought up pedophilia....
(June 27, 2015 at 2:42 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: Proceed with your pointless derail -_-You didn't see the part where Esquilax requested the evidence for my "assertion"?
