RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 27, 2015 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2015 at 3:23 pm by IATIA.)
(June 27, 2015 at 2:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Read carefully...
(May 31, 2014 at 10:59 am)Esquilax Wrote: 16 is the age of consent where I am. Bit shaky, but I don't find this particularly objectionable on its own, and certainly not enough to label the guy a pedophile. Seems like classic theistic stretching beyond their means to me.*Again emphasis mine*
In case you have trouble comprehending what he's saying, and it seems you do, he's stating that he doesn't have a problem with a thirty-something year old having sex with a 16 year old kid, which was AGAINST THE LAW in this scenario..... statutory rape.
It may be against the law at that location, but that does not make it "particularly objectionable on its own". In and of itself, that does not make him a pedophile. Legally, an 18y/o could be charged with "statutory rape". Does that make the 18y/o a pedophile?
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
