RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 29, 2015 at 11:05 pm
(This post was last modified: June 29, 2015 at 11:15 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(June 29, 2015 at 10:35 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Look, I asked a very simple question.
Esquilax made the statement that there is a passage that states a slave "can be beaten" .
(March 4, 2014 at 9:04 am)Esquilax Wrote: And I still have the passage that says they can be beaten, you unbelievable moron.*emphasis mine*
The scripture you posted does not state that slaves "can be beaten" only what happens if they are beaten...
Apparently you're so mentally deficient that you don't understand the concept of implicit.
Why am I not surprised at all?
(June 29, 2015 at 10:35 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Try again.
(June 29, 2015 at 10:22 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I already know what Huggy's going to do. He's going to find a translation that uses a different word: "servant," maybe, or "bondmen," and insist that these aren't slaves-- cuz, you know, a purchased "servant" who has to work for free is totally not a slave. Am I wrong, Huggy?Seems you we're wrong.
No, he's right in the sense that you are retreating into semanticism.
Of course, you're too stupid to actually understand you're doing that, but that's okay. Your seventeen neurons have been struggling to keep up with the demands of running heart and lungs and actually thinking about linguistic comprehension ... I get it, brotha.
