Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach

[dyresand]

*you're, like in 'you're a fucking idiot'.

Are you claiming that Jesus was whipped, beaten and nailed to a cross without even one wound becoming infected in the times when demons substituted the germ theory?

Are you really that fucking dumb?

No, you intellectually dishonest cretin. The wound does not take longer than six hours to be infected. An infection can happen virtually instantly, like Kev noted, and it would be fucking miraculous if after all that flogging, beating and hammering with obviously unsterilized nails the wound DIDN'T become infected.

*emphasis mine*
Ironic that you used the term miraculous.

His whole life was miraculous you muppet.    We're speaking of Jesus here, you know... God in human form, virgin birth, walking on water, people being healed of disease just by touching him, and you speculate that he may have suffered from infection....


Do yourself a favor, sit down and shut up.

Says the guy who believe's in a magic zombe jew that was born from a whore in the middle east, oh and to make things worse she was a "virgin" (Ladies gents i don't like using that word whore so please take no offense). And also believes that adam and eve were tempted by a talking lizard snake. And even a bigger smack to the face that god created human beings. 

1. There is no evidence of a person named jesus dying and coming back to life 

2. The bible is a rip off of other religions of the time

3. You are a disingenuous mother fucker

4. The bible is fucking hearsay it is not a accurate representation of history what so ever....

5. Historical or biblical jesus never existed to begin with.