(June 30, 2015 at 12:33 am)Huggy74 Wrote: To "imply" something and to actually "state" something are two different things, not even close to being semantics .Or is it your position. they are the same?
Just because something is implicit does not mean it is unsaid -- in order to understand the subtext, one has to think about what was said.
Wait, I think I've just discovered your problem here.
(June 30, 2015 at 12:33 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Oh wait.... I forgot who I was talking to. You're the one that misconstrued me speaking in general terminology into speaking of you personally...
When you quote a post of mine, your reply necessarily includes me. You falsely lumped me in on a conversation that I hadn't taken part in, imputing a position to me which I didn't espouse, and when that was pointed out to you, you lacked the moral fiber and integrity to admit your mistake and apologize, a refusal which speak volumes about your lack of character. You're pathetic, and merit only pity, or contempt. I'd feel sorry for you but generally speaking I refuse to pity dipshits who bring their difficulties upon themselves, so for you it's scorn and contempt.
(June 30, 2015 at 12:33 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Do yourself a favor also, go back to your Jello™, and sit down somewhere...
I'm sure when you typed that out, it sounded like a devastating rejoinder.
![[Image: ka37gm.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=oi47.tinypic.com%2Fka37gm.jpg)