(June 30, 2015 at 2:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(June 29, 2015 at 7:58 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Your eisegesis is required by your presuppositions.
Under what basis are you accusing Cato of having presuppositions?
Just so you know, Randy, that question isn't going away. I'm going to ask it every time you toss out this lazy, self reinforcing delusional apologetic, until I get an- no doubt completely self serving and underwhelming- answer. If you keep avoiding it you're only going to look like you have something to hide; maybe it's the fact that you have no basis at all for making that accusation, and you're just doing it as a crass defense mechanism to ad hom your opposition into silence without ever offering a real argument?
I'm not actually sure what this really scary question that you're going to repeat again and again is.
If it's the question that I posted in bold, then my answer is:
Cato's presuppositions are that God does not exist. Consequently, anything that he can twist to his own purposes will be used twisted and used against Christians.
If that is not the really scary question that you're going to repeat again and again, then you'll have to repeat it one more time so that I can address it.
