What IS good, and how do we determine it?

[Fidel_Castronaut]

8. Fidel_Castronaut aka Pandæmonium
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid848245

---

Pandæmonium believing that Denmark has a secular government in spite of being provided with proof that it doesn't, and refusing to acknowledge that he was wrong.

You're seriously delusional.
This is a clear example of the mindset of an atheist, If you won't accept that Denmark's government is in fact NOT secular which is easily provable, how are you going to even begin to discuss spiritual matters?

Your own quote (in bold for clarity)
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid835049

so according to YOU, secularism prevents a state mandated religion.
This link is taken from your own post.
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid846133
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Denmark

Also according to YOU secularism "gives people the ability to chose a religion (or no-religion) without the state choosing for them"
This link is also taken from your exact same post
http://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-po...#pid846133
http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/csrpl/rinv...enmark.htm
Need I go on?
Denmark clearly does not have separation between church and state, yet you fail to acknowledge your own evidence proving this fact.

You're contradicting yourself dude.

I can't wait to hear your next excuse....

---

*sigh*

Still harping on about this nonsense are you?

Rather than respond to this utter moron, I'll do what I've always done and encourage people to read the thread (if they can be arsed, I know I can't) to see where Huggy was proven to be incorrect on every statement made about both secularism and state structures. Pay particular attention to the areas where he reveals a total lack of knowledge of even the most rudimentary ideas of political science, IR and philosophical discourse.

And to clarify, Denmark is de facto secular, regardless of what Huggy here wishes to say about it having an established church (so does the UK, still secular). The context this remark was made in is clear through the thread, conveniently omitted from the above poster's selective mine for quotes.

What I think the post quoted reveals, where he cites supposed 'flip flopping' of members, is that he is literally so obsessed with one up-manship that he has to keep a running tab of times where he believes he's won a point (with whom? No idea). What a strange, bizarre, tragic person.