(October 7, 2010 at 1:48 am)pacian Wrote:(October 7, 2010 at 1:11 am)Cerrone Wrote: I think you're putting too much faith in the behaviour of drunken whores on the dancefloor hahahah the consequence of you telling women this is that you may increase your chances or getting laid because you're creditting them with intelligence... but otherwise your conclusions are meritless.
Women do not filter out partners based on survival traits such as intelligence, strength or the ability to pick apples from a tree, they pick their partner based on physicial cuteness, money (which you could argue was security, and that'd be fairly accurate, but it borders on vanity also) and the idiocy of the man to let himself be controlled. And that is true for the most part.
Lol drunken whores are chemically impaired but yes woman do pick guys who are cuter, athletic, because it represents health. Wealth, like you said, but also charisma, the ability to make friends, to be socially smart in human interactions, leadership qualities, and other positive personality traits. Also, their is Pre-selection, woman like men who other woman like. Status too, are you the carpenter, or are you the king?I'm sure im forgetting stuff, but a good book on female physcology will help better answer questions i'm trying to recall from memory. The more of these positive traits you have, the more attractive you are, the more females you can get, the better your chances of getting a equally desirable female.
I don't think the "selection process" is at all useful in the sense of pairing of man and woman (and this is if you believe in enforced monogamy at all), you mentioned charisma, but without intelligence all charisma is is the ability to talk shit. Therefore women may end up with a very stupid man who has a way with words i.e "lying", and that's certianly no survival trait worth having.
But we as a culture seem to accept and socially encourage shit-talking and spinning lies because it's good business sense that'd serve you well in the exploitative world of capitalism... and that's true, you'll get no arguement from me there. But what's the consequence of this? Surely every generation parented by these kind of people just get stupider, vainer and more dishonest. Is that worth survival? The human race may endure, but it'll be repugnant, even more than it is today.
As Bill Hicks said; "women, FUCK the artists!!!"
(October 7, 2010 at 8:08 am)Dotard Wrote: OMG! I have a kindred spirit! Who'dathought?
I'd like to cordially invite you to join NO MA'AM. See link at bottom of post.
Hahaha thanks for the invite!
Feminism is about as useful as Chauvanism, i've said this to feminists often enough, the real design of progress is surely gender equality, never placing one gender above the other -except in sexual positions.