(July 2, 2015 at 5:18 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: I reviewed the events in question.
The first time his signature became an issue, we asked him to change it, with the intention of changing it for him if he didn't comply. We saw that he had logged in after the PM was sent, and he did not comply. As a result we removed the signature. The context here was that we told Huggy74 and Bad Wolf to discontinue their feud, and Huggy74 chose to put an inflammatory sequence of quotes in his signature afterwards. This hardly counts as discontinuing a feud, in the staff's opinion.
The second time it became an issue we suspended his signature privileges. We don't expect to have to repeat ourselves.
Two takeaways: If staff asks you to do something to rectify a breach of the rules, you are expected to comply, whether you agree with it or not. Furthermore, you're expected to not do the same thing again in the future, and should you choose to do so anyway, you reap what you sow.
I will just add that in my PM exchange with him, almost a year after the events, in which I detailed the result of the investigation I carried out for him (for some reason I was absent for the events in question), I actually stated that "Nobody was victimised nor favoured, indeed the Staff actually bent over backwards to be as fair and as equitable as possible in the circumstances" - a response which was appreciated at the time.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
