(October 7, 2010 at 8:19 am)pacian Wrote: I'm sorry if your the product of rape or something I don't mean to say your inferior or hurt your feelings. Cause it sounds like your fighting this simple concept pretty hard.
Whut?
I just see flaws with your hypothesis and chose the rape example in an attempt to convey what I see wrong with it. You said; "Rape is ALWAYS wrong no matter the context." I disagree.
Taken to extreme you could come up with situations in which it would not be considered wrong. Therefore it would not always decrease survivability of the offspring and may actually increase it.
For you to say, as if it is an absolute fact, if a woman does not chose exactly who fathers the offspring the child has a decreased chance of survival is being a little bit intellectually dishonest IMO. You're starting with a false premise.
If you can somehow provide evidence that your premise is true, please do so. I believe it to be false and contend whether a woman chose the father of her offspring or not has no bearing what-so-ever on their suvivability.
(You can't count possible abortions because if the woman chooses abortion then she didn't chose a father)
--------------
and just to add;
That was an insultive move for you to take. Your premise got challenged and you tried to make my attack on it a personal one stemming from you hurting my feelings with that super superior arguement of yours. You didn't hurt my feelings buddy, I believe I may have hurt yours by argueing your concept is not so "simple".
..|.,
I used to tell a lot of religious jokes. Not any more, I'm a registered sects offender.
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
---------------
...the least christian thing a person can do is to become a christian. ~Chuck
---------------
NO MA'AM
![[Image: attemptingtogiveadamnc.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img824.imageshack.us%2Fimg824%2F7042%2Fattemptingtogiveadamnc.gif)