What IS good, and how do we determine it?

[Cato]

In the "Minimal Fact Approach" thread, I am arguing for the resurrection of Jesus on the basis of four facts which the overwhelming majority of ALL NT scholars (believers and skeptics alike) accept as highly probable.

Here's your problem. Scholars agree that the gospels relate different versions of the resurrection. This is much different than the claim that Christ was actually resurrected. Don't take my words for it though, here's Tim O'Neill's commentary on the subject:

So thinking on the Resurrection in modern scholarship differs widely and it is by no means accepted even by all Christian scholars that it was a historical event whereby Jesus genuinely rose physically from the dead.

http://www.quora.com/How-do-biblical-sch...sus-Christ