RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
July 3, 2015 at 7:44 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2015 at 7:45 pm by Randy Carson.)
(July 3, 2015 at 7:28 pm)Metis Wrote:(July 3, 2015 at 7:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I love it when anti-Christers provide such clear and compelling reasons for their faith.
There goes the persecution complex again.
Randy, we do not agree with you. That does not make us Anti-Christian. If I got a crowbar out and battered you for believing what you do yeah, that would be anti Christian. If I made a petrol bomb and threw it into a church that would be anti christian too. Not agreeing with you? Am I anti-Vegan because I like milk? Perhaps I'm anti-dairy farmers because I don't like cheese. O-Oh my! I suppose because I like laminated floors I must be Anti-Carpetist!
Just because we don't agree with you doesn't mean we want to destroy you. We just think you're wrong, and provided you're not throwing petrol bombs into libraries or stabbing non-Christians we're happy to let you carry on as you are too. That's tolerance, not anti-Catholicism.
If we were Anti-Catholic, you wouldn't be around. There's a lot more non-Catholics than Catholics in America after all.
(July 3, 2015 at 7:29 pm)Mr.wizard Wrote:(July 3, 2015 at 7:23 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: I love it when anti-Christers provide such clear and compelling reasons for their faith.
Ya sure Randy the only reason I don't accept your list as proof of a resurrection is because I'm anti-Christ. I don't know whether a historical jesus existed or not, nor do I care, the point is your "facts" do not prove a resurrection.
Nah...I'm just making a play on words. Some here like to refer to believers as "christers" so I call them "anti-christers" in return.
It's all just good clean fun.
