(July 3, 2015 at 8:09 pm)answer-is-42 Wrote: @Cato it has nothing to do with the mother. This is about the fetus outside the mother
@napolean you are a miserable excuse for a human being. Wishing ill on someone who merely expressed a differing opinion is pathetic and vile. I hope others share in my disgust
@snakeoil. The question of finances is Germaine depending on your stance on healthcare as a moral right. In developing countries it is very common to only provide healthcare after payment, however in the USA emergency healthcare is a right and you must be treated and stabilized regardless of your ability to pay. If you take the stance that health care is only for those who can pay then you arguement is consistent, if not then you will need a better arguement
Do you really think I'm arguing the finances of birth?!? How much does it cost to raise a child in today's 'Murrika?!? How much help is the mother gonna get from you do gooding right to lifers?!? Even that term is misleading because the right to life crowd has absolutely zero fucks to give about children, once they're born. They only care about trampling the rights of the mother to make sure there is a birth.
As far as finding other arguments, if you can read you'll already understand that I have.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
