(July 5, 2015 at 10:08 am)pool Wrote:(July 5, 2015 at 9:41 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: Its not the atheist's job to define god, it's the job of the person making the claim to define what they are talking about.
Ah.Tomato,tomato.
Believe in a god or don't believe in a god - do what you gotta do.
Theists are saying that there is a god and they don't even know what god is.
Atheists are saying that there isn't a god and they are also clueless about what god is.
Basically what theists are doing is claiming the existence of something which is nothing.
Basically what atheists are doing is denying the existence of the something,that is,nothing proposed by theists because of the lack of proof from theists to prove the existence of something which is nothing. xD
How i look at it - Both of this shit is terribly wrong.
They made a ism for believing in something which is something,that is,nothing.Then they made an ism for not believing in the something,that is,nothing proposed by the former ism members which is nothing,that is,something because of the lack of proof of something,that is,nothing proposed by the former ism members,that is,theists.
Total no brainer atleast for me anyway.
Well your simply wrong about the definition of atheism then. There's a very very small minority that is saying god doesn't exist. 99% of us are just saying no one has proven that god exists. Theists are the ones putting out the premise that there's this god. We just want proof.
For me no one has come even CLOSE to proving a god. Then what we starting about the parameters I just don't care. Whatever. You put the premise in a god. You define the parameters then make your proof. Good luck. If you start being able to prove it I'll become a believer in god (not worship you understand but believe).
“Religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool.”
― Mark Twain
― Mark Twain
