Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach

[Esquilax]

I wonder how WLC would handle a presuppositional atheist. One who simply states that God does not exist, and that they know this is true. He can't ask for evidence, now can he?

Will he partake in "Does too", "Does not"...

There's a brilliant bit in the Q&A following the debate between Matt Dillahunty (whom WLC will not debate, incidentally) and Sye Bruggencate, where someone tried that exact schtick on the latter party and Eric Hovind. When someone took their exact same position and changed the topic, those two chucklefucks dismissed it out of hand as ridiculous, asserting sarcastically "if you want to hitch your wagon to that star, be my guest."

Their heads were too far up their asses to see the irony of that, but then, there was a lot of things they failed to spot during that debate.

Edited to add: Incidentally, WLC has also already said how he'd react, and it basically is "does too," "does not," because he asserts that not changing one's mind is the hallmark of a true presupposition.