(July 5, 2015 at 2:41 pm)Dragonetti Wrote: You keep referring us to your incoherent quote. We have read your quote. You are not understanding the words? It makes no sense what so ever. You can keep telling yourself it does, but it does not. Please explain to me like I am five years old, what am I missing from your quotes? It clearly states the burden of proof should be on the Atheist side? Which makes no sense.
ting ting ting ting ting ting!
Analogy time
Theists: Cat is dog.
Atheists: I don't completely agree or i disagree.
Me: lol cat is cat,cat aian't dog lmao.
Theists: Oh. *runs to the room crying*
Me: ._.
Atheists: Haha look at theist noobs,lets get outta here. [this is the appropriate response
]Atheists: Haha look at theist noobs,they are so wrong,lets not get outta here and stay here. [this is the inappropriate response
in which case atheists have the burden of proof -because theists are no longer making a claim,so you're just sittin there rejecting a claim that isn't even made *derp* so you're the one making a claim in that case] [i specifically used "noobs" because you are a 5 year old and i'm told 5 year olds play COD]
Better Analogy time
Theism is the mother.
She gave birth to her sons atheism,deism,agnosticism,gnosticism,polytheism,ditheism,pantheism,etc.(gawd lady xD)
Atheists: mommy can't reproduce ; _ ; i'm adopted.
Theists: no lol we aer her cheldrn.
Atheists: no you fucking idiot!i checked.. - she's a man!
So Atheists are saying that Theism is a man and theism couldn't have taken Atheists out of her vagina(because obviously she doesn't have one).
If Theism is indeed a man then Atheists cease to exist(just like how the "Mother" cease to exist)because a man can't give birth xD [ps: adoption is a big NO NO in the analogy]
(July 5, 2015 at 2:43 pm)Alex K Wrote:(July 4, 2015 at 9:13 pm)Rhythm Wrote: I have no -clue- what that question is supposed to mean. The right to a thought? Is that remotely enforcable one way or another, do rights protect thoughts or prohibit them? Who would say that we don't, and who would know, and what could or would be done about it?
I think OP kinda meant "having the right to be atheist" in the sense of "can atheism ever be a rationally justified position to take". at least that's how I read it...
Yes!Thank you!
(July 5, 2015 at 5:40 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: OOOOOOOH I get it!
poolie boy here is one of 'those people'
you know like, 'everybody is dumb and I'm special' people. at least that's how it reads
Precisely,i'm called a egoist,asshole,narcissist and a lot more by one of my girl[space]friend.
Strange enough she still sticks around.What an idiot hahahahahahahhahah
