RE: Movie industry going down ?
July 9, 2015 at 9:45 am
(This post was last modified: July 9, 2015 at 10:21 am by Excited Penguin.)
Imdb has movies to show you in the hundreds of thousands. Wikipedia combined with your
Your list is biased because you are trying to include only movies wikipedia lists, when we all know wikipedia rarely lists everything of anything, on any matter at all, and that is precisely the problem - that it is being moderated by anyone and everyone and it's about everything, whereas I'm not sure who moderates imdb but I'm fairly sure it's just about movies and they rarely ever fuck up about their information, given how it's such a restrained environment by comparison. Your list is also biased because you're trying to include only some kinds of movies(some little part of all feature films released in an english language) and failing miserably even at that, you're suddenly not making any sense, covering your tracks as you go forward and I point out the mistakes.
By the way, avalanching me with your superiority in the code making business, mentioning the obvious fact that I can't do whatever it was you wanted to do is the classic stance of someone who's just lost the argument. Critics aren't supposed to be better at what those they critic do, that's incredibly facile of you to suggest. You can be Napoleon for all I care, if you failed to conquer Russia, you're getting booed, and there's nothing you can do about it.
You're a cheat. That's the gist of it. Get over yourself. This is my last post to you in this thread, you murky clown.
Also, you can insult me as much as you want. If it's gratuitous, however, you're not doing yourself any favors.
Quote:awesome coding skillsgot you some odd thousands. Isn't it kind of sad how you're trying to justify your failure again and again? I only call it a failure because I already asked you what your goal was and how/did you achieve it and you didn't have a good answer to that. So yeah, you're a failure, at least from my perspective and concerning this little project of yours.
Your list is biased because you are trying to include only movies wikipedia lists, when we all know wikipedia rarely lists everything of anything, on any matter at all, and that is precisely the problem - that it is being moderated by anyone and everyone and it's about everything, whereas I'm not sure who moderates imdb but I'm fairly sure it's just about movies and they rarely ever fuck up about their information, given how it's such a restrained environment by comparison. Your list is also biased because you're trying to include only some kinds of movies(some little part of all feature films released in an english language) and failing miserably even at that, you're suddenly not making any sense, covering your tracks as you go forward and I point out the mistakes.
By the way, avalanching me with your superiority in the code making business, mentioning the obvious fact that I can't do whatever it was you wanted to do is the classic stance of someone who's just lost the argument. Critics aren't supposed to be better at what those they critic do, that's incredibly facile of you to suggest. You can be Napoleon for all I care, if you failed to conquer Russia, you're getting booed, and there's nothing you can do about it.
You're a cheat. That's the gist of it. Get over yourself. This is my last post to you in this thread, you murky clown.
Also, you can insult me as much as you want. If it's gratuitous, however, you're not doing yourself any favors.