RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 10, 2015 at 3:52 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 3:55 pm by Pizza.)
Compression of this thread:
"The resurrection narrative is very plausible because Christian god exists. Other views are more implausible than resurrection."
"Resurrection narrative has lower plausibility than rival views because of facts about human biology and psychology. Rival views like resurrection is a myth theory (Jesus existed but the resurrection is a myth) and swoon theory are more likely."
"The resurrection narrative is very plausible because Christian god exists. Other views are more implausible than resurrection."
"Resurrection narrative has lower plausibility than rival views because of facts about human biology and psychology. Rival views like resurrection is a myth theory (Jesus existed but the resurrection is a myth) and swoon theory are more likely."



It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal