RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
July 11, 2015 at 5:37 pm
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2015 at 5:38 pm by Longhorn.)
(July 11, 2015 at 5:32 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: First, let's be clear that you and others are ROUTINELY clamoring for God to prove that He exists in some dramatically undeniable fashion and that His failure to do so PROVES that He doesn't exist (conveniently forgetting that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence).
Don't put words in my mouth Randy.
Show me the exact quote where I said anything of the above or shut up.
I have never claimed to be able to prove that god doesn't exist, because I can't. Stop with the fucking strawmen. It's pissing me off.
Quote:Second, you seem to be saying that IF God were to reveal Himself in some dramatically undeniable fashion, this would be a violation of our free will.
That sort of covers all the bases, doesn't it? You have an argument either way.
No, baby. That's what YOU seem to be saying.
(July 10, 2015 at 9:12 am)Just Yesterday Randy Carson Wrote: If God were to make a more overt gesture of His existence, He would interfere with our free will.
It's just that simple.
Quote:However, my position (if anyone should ask) is that God HAS revealed Himself dramatically to some people AND they still had free will and the ability to choose how they would respond. Moses could have seen the burning bush, and run the other way. Mary could have said, "No."
You're a fucking liar.