(October 14, 2010 at 12:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote: OTOH, Maher's point is that if a politician believes in magic underwear or talking snakes it should be taken as evidence that he is not quite rational. I agree with Maher. I would never vote for a nut case like Romney or Huckabee/Palin/any-of-the-other-fundie-shithead.
An interesting question is how many of them REALLY believe this stuff vs. how many of them play the role to appeal to certain voters. I'd be astonished if Bush or Palin knew even a fraction of what was in the Bible. Bush probably thinks the Holy Spirit is the wine served at communion.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
