(July 18, 2015 at 8:33 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Do you begin to understand why we put zero stock into eyewitness testimony? It's utterly unreliable. It's why legal professionals use it to corroborate actual evidence rather than relying solely on it. By itself, it just creates a narrative. Narratives aren't proof of anything.
In other words, Jenny's hypothetical experience may indeed be valid, but unless she can produce actual evidence of it, evidence that can't be more easily explained by something else (Occam's Razor is a bitch, innit?), her claims of the divine are meaningless.
BINGO!
Though they might mean Jenny needs a checkup.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.