Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 5:15 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Dual core, Quad core??
Tiberius Offline
Question Everything.
*******
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 14932
Threads: 684
Joined: August 25, 2008
Reputation: 143
#21
RE: Dual core, Quad core??
June 4, 2009 at 7:32 am
Kyu Wrote:no one can persuade me that Linux is in some way inherently superior to Windows
And you call other people an "evangelist". Your a fundamentalist mate Big Grin

Fact still remains that Linux is far more secure than Windows for a variety of reasons, and for me, security is everything. Also uses a decent file system so it only needs defragging when the disk is 90% full. My girlfriend's XP laptop was using Windows XP on a FAT32 partition. I mean, come on!

Installing is also far easier. I used to spend ages searching on the internet for decent Windows software that was free, then I had to install and configure it through a series of clicking on "Next" buttons. Linux does it all for you Big Grin
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Off Topic v
Dual core, Quad core??

Messages In This Thread
Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 3:48 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Darwinian - May 6, 2009 at 3:55 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 4:51 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 6, 2009 at 5:45 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - May 6, 2009 at 5:53 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - May 6, 2009 at 6:03 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 6, 2009 at 8:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - May 7, 2009 at 12:58 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by padraic - May 7, 2009 at 2:43 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 4:56 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 1:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:20 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 3, 2009 at 2:04 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:08 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 3, 2009 at 2:41 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 4, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:00 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 7:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 2:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 11:32 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 11:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 7:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 3:25 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 3:59 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 4:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 4, 2009 at 4:29 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 5:05 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 7:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 8:13 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 4, 2009 at 8:38 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 4, 2009 at 8:51 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 4, 2009 at 9:34 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 1:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 8:44 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 2:46 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 3:15 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 5, 2009 at 3:16 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 5, 2009 at 4:23 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 4:21 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 5:02 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 8:47 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 5, 2009 at 6:43 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 3:25 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 5, 2009 at 9:18 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Samson - June 5, 2009 at 11:35 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Edwardo Piet - June 6, 2009 at 12:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:04 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:08 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:10 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 8:12 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:22 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 6, 2009 at 9:05 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Tiberius - June 6, 2009 at 9:02 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by moleque - June 7, 2009 at 7:35 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Rob - June 6, 2009 at 8:17 pm
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 3:46 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by leo-rcc - June 7, 2009 at 4:30 am
RE: Dual core, Quad core?? - by Kyuuketsuki - June 7, 2009 at 4:35 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)