Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 14, 2024, 2:43 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
numerical mriacle.....again
#1
numerical mriacle.....again
Hello,

i am an ex-muslim, i am an atheist now.

I have to say that i have seen many of these numerical miracles, 19 based, 7 based, Surah khaf and so on and so forth and none of them have ever impressed me or let me doubt my belief.

Quite recently one of my muslim friends showed me this "miracle" in the Quran. Which i cannot get my head around at all. I just cannot belief that this happens by coincidence. This is imo very different from the rest of these numerical miracles which i call 100% bullshit. Maybe sb. can clarify this for me. ( I dont mean statements like " happens in ever book" or "there are so many numbers in the Quran" ).

This "miracle" is really straightforward and also impressive. And no, noone put it in there otherwise people would have known that a lot sooner and also whoever is familiar with the compilation of the quran, knows that this is even more unlikely to have happend intentionally. And no, it does not matter that there were other versions of the Quran or that it was complied later.

copied from <snip>

In this example we see clearly nummerical miracle, between odd and even numbers and how the correspond to sum of chapters and verses

[Image: 15gb8e8.jpg]
[Image: 24ys6rr.jpg]


Here, we have repetetive nummerical values from the table above
for example chapters 85 and 99 have same nummerical value 107, we summerize all repetitive nummerical values

[Image: 1z1wpyp.jpg]


Here, we have non-repetitive nummerical values, and we summerize them also
[Image: 259j3pj.jpg]


We can clearly see golden ratio between Reptitive and non-repetitive nummerical values from this table

[Image: 166k5z6.jpg]

The only objection i have found to this is, that given the total 12791 (=4885 + 7906). The more accurate divison to get close to the golden mean(=1.618033) point would be 7905/4886 = 1.61788... instead of 7906/4885 = 1.61842....

Here we go, anyone here not impressed by this? If so, why?
And yes i have read this response
<snip>
and yes, i know that there are many errors in the quran. Wink

i have checked both of the claims, they are correct

bye for now and thanks for reading.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 26, 2014 at 8:55 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Zen Badger - April 26, 2014 at 9:02 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 26, 2014 at 9:05 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Fidel_Castronaut - April 26, 2014 at 9:34 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 26, 2014 at 9:53 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Mister Agenda - April 29, 2014 at 9:31 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Ksa - May 9, 2014 at 12:08 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Fidel_Castronaut - April 26, 2014 at 9:58 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 26, 2014 at 10:26 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Cato - April 28, 2014 at 5:27 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by ManMachine - April 29, 2014 at 8:33 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 29, 2014 at 9:24 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by ManMachine - April 29, 2014 at 11:06 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 29, 2014 at 1:28 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by truthBtold - April 29, 2014 at 1:31 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Cato - April 26, 2014 at 10:13 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 29, 2014 at 6:45 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Faith No More - April 29, 2014 at 9:40 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 29, 2014 at 10:48 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by jesus_wept - April 28, 2014 at 3:27 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Confused Ape - April 28, 2014 at 5:32 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by sven - April 28, 2014 at 5:33 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by FreeTony - April 28, 2014 at 5:50 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 28, 2014 at 10:58 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by NoraBrimstone - April 28, 2014 at 11:47 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Chas - May 6, 2014 at 6:22 am
Re: numerical mriacle.....again - by NoraBrimstone - April 28, 2014 at 6:01 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by FreeTony - April 28, 2014 at 11:31 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 28, 2014 at 6:27 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Cato - April 28, 2014 at 7:49 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Angrboda - April 29, 2014 at 11:21 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by sven - April 29, 2014 at 1:00 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by JuliaL - April 29, 2014 at 7:16 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 29, 2014 at 8:29 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Hoopington - May 8, 2014 at 5:21 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Angrboda - April 28, 2014 at 12:07 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Minimalist - April 28, 2014 at 12:27 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by JuliaL - April 28, 2014 at 12:51 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Faith No More - April 28, 2014 at 1:02 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - April 29, 2014 at 8:08 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Tonus - April 29, 2014 at 1:41 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by thequestion - April 29, 2014 at 2:13 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Angrboda - May 2, 2014 at 9:49 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by jesus_wept - May 4, 2014 at 5:22 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2014 at 6:13 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Cato - May 4, 2014 at 7:15 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Mudhammam - May 4, 2014 at 8:37 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 4:25 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2014 at 4:29 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by eyemixer - May 4, 2014 at 5:02 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 4:35 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 5:08 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2014 at 5:11 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 5:17 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2014 at 5:22 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 4, 2014 at 5:30 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 5:31 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 4, 2014 at 5:51 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 4, 2014 at 5:34 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 5:37 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2014 at 5:43 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 5:51 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 5:56 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 4, 2014 at 6:28 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by fr0d0 - May 4, 2014 at 6:07 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 6:27 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Cato - May 5, 2014 at 5:28 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 6:35 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 4, 2014 at 6:41 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 7:06 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 4, 2014 at 7:30 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 4, 2014 at 7:41 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by jesus_wept - May 5, 2014 at 4:29 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 5, 2014 at 5:03 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 5, 2014 at 7:14 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by jesus_wept - May 5, 2014 at 7:38 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by pocaracas - May 5, 2014 at 9:03 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 5, 2014 at 10:12 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by jesus_wept - May 6, 2014 at 4:10 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 6, 2014 at 7:02 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Cato - May 6, 2014 at 4:13 pm
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by jesus_wept - May 8, 2014 at 4:48 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 8, 2014 at 11:01 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by Chas - May 9, 2014 at 11:45 am
RE: numerical mriacle.....again - by lordofgemini - May 6, 2014 at 4:47 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)