(February 12, 2010 at 1:34 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:You are thus checking whether your fabulations match within your understanding. On the basis of what you've demonstrated here on AF that includes metaphorical interpretation, ambibuity of terms, lack of definition. That is not logic. Logic constitutes a far more rigorous framework than loose interpretation, not ambibuity of terms, special pleading, circular reasoning, cherry picking and what have you for logical fallacies. What you are doing has nothing to do with logic.(February 12, 2010 at 11:24 am)Purple Rabbit Wrote: Where exactly do you observe logic in your fabulation?
The peer review occurs between those sharing the same belief. We can check if what either of us concludes is in line with both our understanding, and logically conclude if either of us is acting within acceptable parameters.
When considering the root of faith, or our own faith, and our reference for that faith as inherited in biblical text.
"I'm like a rabbit suddenly trapped, in the blinding headlights of vacuous crap" - Tim Minchin in "Storm"
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0
Christianity is perfect bullshit, christians are not - Purple Rabbit, honouring CS Lewis
Faith is illogical - fr0d0