If he lost, the pupil wouldn't owe the teacher an money other than the settlement
If he won, the pupil would only owe the arrangement
I he wins, the pupil owes nothing to the teacher because of the settlement
If he loses, the pupil owes the settlement
The young man's reply is false right here "If you win, then by our agreement I need not pay you." he is leaving out being payed by the settlement.
My synopsis is the teacher if winning would get nothing because by his own rules he is owed nothing. If the student wins then he would still owe for the arrangement, because during the case there is nothing owed to the teaches, until he wins. Another suit could then be filed for compensation.
If he won, the pupil would only owe the arrangement
I he wins, the pupil owes nothing to the teacher because of the settlement
If he loses, the pupil owes the settlement
The young man's reply is false right here "If you win, then by our agreement I need not pay you." he is leaving out being payed by the settlement.
My synopsis is the teacher if winning would get nothing because by his own rules he is owed nothing. If the student wins then he would still owe for the arrangement, because during the case there is nothing owed to the teaches, until he wins. Another suit could then be filed for compensation.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
