Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 16, 2024, 7:14 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How is the validity of this?
#1
How is the validity of this?
Ok logic nuts, This is an attempt at your language, give me some criticism please.


1-All things exist as something, even as only a concept
2-To be part of "reality" requires a materialistic or tangible component
3-God exists outside reality

Should be equivelant to God is an abstract idea outside of reality

4-Math has no materialistic or tangible component
5-Math exists outide reality

6-Math can not be used for absolute truthful proofs (?? idk how to word that)
7-Math can be used as an objective mental construct to predict with great certaintity events in reality
8-Math, when used objectively, is usefull in reality
9-Math uses absolute values and intuitive rounding(.999~ = 1) to complete practical solutions to problems in reality

10- If God is used as an objective mental construct and give him a value of a moral absolute, he could be used to solve useful practical problems in reality.

I'm losing how to word this. To Conclude ,Both Math and God exist as useful mental constructs outside reality. They are also both usefull for solving problems and guiding societies when used as an objective moral absolute.

I know it's going to get torn up, but have at it.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply



Messages In This Thread
How is the validity of this? - by tackattack - March 23, 2010 at 12:20 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by theblindferrengi - March 23, 2010 at 2:01 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tackattack - March 23, 2010 at 3:50 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tavarish - March 23, 2010 at 12:26 pm
RE: How is the validity of this? - by Zhalentine - March 23, 2010 at 12:46 pm
RE: How is the validity of this? - by theblindferrengi - March 23, 2010 at 7:38 pm
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tackattack - March 24, 2010 at 5:44 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tavarish - March 24, 2010 at 9:43 pm
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tackattack - March 25, 2010 at 2:02 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tavarish - March 26, 2010 at 1:18 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by Tiberius - March 23, 2010 at 7:12 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by fr0d0 - March 23, 2010 at 6:33 pm
RE: How is the validity of this? - by libraryowl - March 23, 2010 at 8:18 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by RedFish - March 23, 2010 at 10:19 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tackattack - March 26, 2010 at 3:00 am
RE: How is the validity of this? - by tavarish - March 26, 2010 at 9:33 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)