RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
August 21, 2016 at 8:29 pm
(This post was last modified: August 21, 2016 at 8:30 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Lack of evidence can be considered proof to the contrary if there is compelling reason to believe that the hypothesis being examined, if true, can not but leave evidence that would have been uncovered and recognized in the examinations that have been conducted thus far.