RE: Another Circumcision thread
October 9, 2016 at 3:20 pm
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2016 at 3:22 pm by Aegon.)
(October 9, 2016 at 1:37 pm)Mermaid Wrote:(October 9, 2016 at 1:25 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: IMO, abortion should only be allowed when there is a significant risk to the mother's health. Otherwise, she should've been more careful and knew the risks going in. Her not wanting to "inconvenience herself" or the child not becoming an orphan is not justification enough for us to murder our young like that. It just simply isn't and it makes me sick that anyone thinks it is.
Not your uterus, not your business. Period. End of sentence.
You can't have an opinion on abortion unless you have a uterus? Then why are there women posting in this thread?
Edit: Dumb post. Circumcision is an issue with consent, not a male/female thing. However, the idea that there can't be a debate about the personhood of a fetus unless everyone in the debate can be pregnant is asinine.