If everything is natural, then we deny principle of sufficient reason, because every natural being being defined by its nature which in turn must be defined by what is not defined by nature, the beyond natural, the super-natural or supernatural. But, I think no one can deny sufficient reason coherently, because everything we observe, we know that it must have a sufficient reason. Therefore, not everything is natural and hence there exist at least one supernatural being.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 8, 2024, 11:20 am
Poll: What's your stance on the supernatural? This poll is closed. |
|||
Not a naturalist | 4 | 11.43% | |
Methodological naturalist | 12 | 34.29% | |
Philosophical naturalist | 16 | 45.71% | |
Other (please specify) | 3 | 8.57% | |
Total | 35 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
Your position on naturalism
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)