Is a PhD in Science worth it?
April 2, 2017 at 8:16 am
(This post was last modified: April 2, 2017 at 8:17 am by Jehanne.)
Of course, I am talking about people who are just "good students", and not people who are brilliant, such as Stephen Hawking, whose destiny it is to teach at Cambridge. Having said that, it seems to me that Universities are operating a bit of a pyramid scheme, in that they can attract a lot of very talented individuals to become graduate students, whom they pay low wages to, who then perform the work of the University, such as teaching undergraduates, grading papers, etc. And, if they are one of the 60 or so percent, they can, after 4 to 8 years, get their PhD in a very nice commencement ceremony.
But, in doing that, they are giving up high paying jobs with great benefits all the while losing out on home equity, compound interest on their retirement, seniority and experience in their careers, etc. And, then, to top it off, once they have their PhD, they are likely to have accumulated some more debt, but after commencement, many of them are without jobs! And, worse off, industry, for many jobs, views them as being "over-educated and under-qualified".
And, so, short of being brilliant (which usually means being born brilliant), "Is a PhD in Science really worth it?"
But, in doing that, they are giving up high paying jobs with great benefits all the while losing out on home equity, compound interest on their retirement, seniority and experience in their careers, etc. And, then, to top it off, once they have their PhD, they are likely to have accumulated some more debt, but after commencement, many of them are without jobs! And, worse off, industry, for many jobs, views them as being "over-educated and under-qualified".
And, so, short of being brilliant (which usually means being born brilliant), "Is a PhD in Science really worth it?"
