Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 10:21 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why William Lane Craig is a dope.
#1
Why William Lane Craig is a dope.
Emphasis is from Dr. Griffiths:

Quote:Unlike Newton's mechanics, or Maxwell's electrodynamics, or Einsteins' relativity, quantum theory was not created -- or even definitively packaged -- by one individual, and it retains to this day some of the scars of its exhilarating but traumatic youth.  There is no general consensus as to what its fundamental principles are, how it should be taught, or what it really "means".  Every competent physicist can "do" quantum mechanics, but the stories we tell ourselves about what we are doing are as various as the tales of Scheherazade, and almost as implausible.  Richard Feynam (one of its greatest practitioners) remarked, "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics."

The purpose of this book is to teach you how to do quantum mechanics.  Apart from some essential background in Chapter 1, the deeper quasi-philosophical questions are saved for the end.  I do not believe one can intelligently discuss what quantum mechanics means until one has a firm sense of what quantum mechanics does.  But if you absolutely cannot wait, by all means read the Afterword immediately following Chapter 1.

Not only is quantum theory conceptually rich, it is also technically difficult, and exact solutions to all but the most artificial textbook examples are few and far between... (Preface, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edition, Professor David J. Griffiths, Reed College)

I posted this in the physics subforum to have a discussion as to the fact that quantum mechanics is fundamentally different than our classical notions of space and time, which means that such arguments as the Aristotelian Kalam Cosmological Argument are DOA as far as modern physics is concerned.

Of course, it is clear to me that Dr. Craig does not understand what quantum mechanics does.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 13, 2017 at 6:59 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Alex K - July 13, 2017 at 7:10 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Minimalist - July 13, 2017 at 1:47 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 13, 2017 at 8:50 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Succubus - July 13, 2017 at 9:17 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 13, 2017 at 9:34 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Succubus - July 13, 2017 at 9:41 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Cyberman - July 13, 2017 at 10:02 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by brewer - July 13, 2017 at 1:45 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 13, 2017 at 6:50 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Astonished - July 14, 2017 at 1:17 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 14, 2017 at 11:24 am
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Astonished - July 14, 2017 at 5:38 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 14, 2017 at 7:19 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Amarok - July 14, 2017 at 7:30 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Astonished - July 14, 2017 at 7:41 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Amarok - July 14, 2017 at 7:53 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Jehanne - July 14, 2017 at 8:37 pm
RE: Why William Lane Craig is a dope. - by Astonished - July 15, 2017 at 12:58 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  More nonsense from William Craig... Jehanne 34 3330 July 3, 2016 at 11:52 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)