(July 29, 2017 at 1:49 pm)Astonished Wrote:(July 29, 2017 at 12:33 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I evaluate ideas on there merits not the identity of those who have them. Regardless, Nagel is more than qualified to discuss the relationship between the quantitative inquiries of natural science and the qualitative inquires of teleology, value, and experience. If what you say is true then people trained only in the natural sciences would be barred from contributing to any discussions about ethics, aesthetics, linguistics, or logic.
I normally don't do this in reply to things unless I'm playing along with a running joke, but...well, just this once, here's a pic retort.
![[Image: Gt+he+forgot+to+pull+the+cap+on+the+firs...c50683.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=static4.fjcdn.com%2Fcomments%2FGt%2Bhe%2Bforgot%2Bto%2Bpull%2Bthe%2Bcap%2Bon%2Bthe%2Bfirst%2Bone%2B_ebd1e820a770bc105c716aaf7bc50683.jpg)
You don't have any!
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
