(February 17, 2019 at 2:38 pm)Yonadav Wrote:(February 17, 2019 at 2:06 pm)Brian37 Wrote: He ultimately wants to convince himself that if his version of "responsibility" with cars in his example works, why wouldn't it work with guns? The problem isn't "responsibility". The problem with both guns and cars, is that marketing sells humans a sense of entitlement, and that, far too often can lead people, with both guns and cars to not take those products seriously. But the difference between a gun and a car, is that if you leave your keys in your car and it gets stolen, while still a lapse in judgment, a car cannot be taken 32 stories up into a hotel to murder 52 music concert goers.You are happy when people are killed with guns, because it gives you another opportunity for cheap moral superiority. Your outrage is all about you feeling good about you.
Pious much?
