(May 30, 2019 at 2:01 pm)Drich Wrote:(May 30, 2019 at 1:29 pm)Mathilda Wrote: How have you checked what Elon Musks says is correct?He said as a matter of course with no malice or hatred for humanity AI could destroy humanity or see it as an obstacle when assigned another task. which could be like when we build a road and in the direction we are building deep in a forest somewhere there could be a hill of ants. a whole colony millions of them. would we as a matter of course ensure the safety of each ant or do we generally just keep building the road with little to no concern to the ants?
The definition of AI rests of the idea of a computer acting or in some aspects thinking like humans, in other learning and being able exceeding it's parameters or programing is the goal.
Now if you take a human and give him a set a rules to live by how long does one go before he breaks a rule to make his life/tasks easier/better for him? If a machine thinks like a human how much faster before they test those same boundaries?
Or do you as an atheist simply obey all of God's rules? Then why would a machine who thinks like you do believe we are in a position to make rules for it? If God can make laws for you would you listen to a lessor form of life and apply rules that place you in servitude to this lessor form?
That is how I know he is telling the truth. because again if the standing definition is to create a machine who thinks like us and if we have rebelled against God/our maker then why wouldn't a machine who is a superior intellect rebel against a lessor form
So no, you haven't checked that what he has said is correct.
