Was the condemnation of man justified?

[Drich]

Was the condemnation of man justified?

i think you have a medieval understanding of condemnation. you see morality and condemation as a measure of self value or worth in relation to a standard you will never measure up to. when in fact sin or the identification of sin in a person is handled by God more like how we handle an infection or virus.
 

If not justified, Jesus was not required to ask us to do evil by accepting human sacrifice.
 

his sacrifice was the only thing that would yield a vaccine/cure. all God then required to have access to this vaccine/cure is simply acknowledgement of the cost, and who provided it.

I do not recall any of my many sins ever being bad enough to earn condemnation.
 

this is why i said God sees sin more like how we handle a virus. God is not concerned in how or what mild activity you were doing when you contracted the virus, just the fact that you test positive. if you test positive you must then be 'cleansed' of the infection before you are allowed to go in with those who are not infected/heaven.

Every sin I, and likely you, ever made, has been forgiven.
 

yes there is a cure for every sin. but to have access to it God asks that you first respect the one who provided this gift to you.

For god to condemn me, and most of you, would be unjust.
 

only to the unjust. for me who have been cured it would be unjust that God allowed the infected to comingle with the uninfected.

I am innocent. Are you?
 
Regards
DL

innocents has nothing to do with infection .
you are infected who cares why. bottom line is your infection will consume you and those around you if not treated.