(September 27, 2021 at 11:57 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: How does that apply when the well-being and happiness of one person conflicts with that of others? For example, suppose I determine that torturing and murdering people is best for my well-being and happiness. However, since most people object to being tortured and murdered, my own well-being and happiness clearly reduces that of other people (for the record, I’m not endorsing torture and murder - I’m neither a CIA employee nor Scandinavian).
Should I be socially empowered to torture and murder?
Boru
If I believe that each person has value, I cannot, on an individual level, also decide that killing others is valid even if that is best for me (unless they are trying to kill me).
Then comes the problem of group competition for scarce resources, competition of political systems, and wars. This involves a societal choice to kill, with a promise of either securing a better future for all, or protecting us from future bad things. I have no categorical answer for this one.
