RE: A Half-Serious Definition of God
December 17, 2021 at 10:17 am
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2021 at 10:19 am by polymath257.)
(December 16, 2021 at 11:38 pm)Helios Wrote:(December 16, 2021 at 10:37 pm)polymath257 Wrote: And here I thought you were an advocate of classical logic.He's advocating whatever benefits his belief in magic. He's an epistemic grifter for theism.
OK, give your axioms and rules of deduction for the logic you want to use. Make sure you include how to use quantifier logic as well as propositional logic.
In particular, give your rules for defining something prior to showing it exists and is unique.
Make sure I can't just define the Invisible Pink Unicorn to be that which is the greatest possible unicorn that is also pink and invisible. because such a thing would *have* to exist since it is the greatest, right?
It does make me wonder if he has studied any logic past what Aristotle did. Maybe some Boole? Or Frege? Cantor? Russell? Hilbert? Skolem? Godel? Brouwer? Cohen?
Hell, if he wants someone with his own biases, maybe Platinga?