RE: YOU!
December 17, 2008 at 8:24 am
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2008 at 8:25 am by infidel666.)
If any part of the "supernatural" were observable, it would, by definition, become part of the natural world, and therefore stop being "supernatural." How can you provide evidence of that which cannot be observed?
We observe new phenomenon all the time. Some of these observations are so surprising that they lead to paradigm shifts in physics and other fields. I think it is rather hubritic to think that science is "true" and all else is "false." Time and again, science has been proven at least partially wrong, and I think it a very safe assumption that there will be amazing discoveries in the future.
That said, science is the best explanation that we have so far, and I will certainly take it over some intuited wild guess regarding a creator whom certain people have imagined to be a certain way, and who they claim tries to communicate with us through their crazy writings. Belief in such a thing is reckless and harmful, to say the least.
We observe new phenomenon all the time. Some of these observations are so surprising that they lead to paradigm shifts in physics and other fields. I think it is rather hubritic to think that science is "true" and all else is "false." Time and again, science has been proven at least partially wrong, and I think it a very safe assumption that there will be amazing discoveries in the future.
That said, science is the best explanation that we have so far, and I will certainly take it over some intuited wild guess regarding a creator whom certain people have imagined to be a certain way, and who they claim tries to communicate with us through their crazy writings. Belief in such a thing is reckless and harmful, to say the least.