Objections to the April Fools Day prank.

[Aegrus]

1. It's my site
2. It was a joke
3. He/she was being disruptive (while simultaneously being disruptive).

1. Please point out where I have used that argument.
2. It was a joke. A prank for April Fools Day. If you don't have a sense of humour, that is your problem, not mine.
3. This entire bloody mess was disruptive, but as you can see, we have only so far banned one person over it, and that was a person who wasn't involved in the first place, but rather decided to start flame baiting and trying to cause more chaos.

1. I don't think Tiberius has used that argument- I think other people have used that argument for him, and AA has gotten words and people all blended together in his head.

2. I agree. It was a joke. The socks insulted me (and people in general), so I wasn't happy, but I dealt with it. Now that it's over, I find it funny, and I'm not bothered by it any more. Whatever underlying, long-standing issues it called up, I'm not a part of, so I can't argue one way or the other about those.

3. There's no call for flame-baiting. Tiberius says that Whateverist deserved to be banned, and I believe him, because thus far he's seemed like a good, fair administrator.