(April 5, 2012 at 7:46 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Alei said she wouldn't, not that she was. Shell quoted a recent PM as far as I know, not one since that statement, as it had only just been made.She wouldn't...but she did. Seems hypocritical to me.
Quote:Shell deliberately used a private correspondance between Alei and what Alei thought was an independant ally in LMA who was suffering similar attacks to herself that Shell had been inflicting on her. More reserved than the outright slagging off that Shell issued after this new information granted (and I believe Shell apologised for that outburst), but obvious attacks to me.I never said it wasn't deliberate. My point was, deliberate or not, Shell didn't do anything wrong by using such correspondence.
Quote:Alei has stated her opinion and kudos to her, chooses to step back from it.Apologizing for something doesn't magically make it right. In fact, I'd say the fact that the apology was issued is an admission that what she did was wrong. So yes, the proof was proof, and even if it wasn't, alei's apology would suffice.
So the 'proof' isn't proof.
Quote:Sure Alei was/is hurting. Alei was reigning it in publically, but not privately. Surely you don't demand control of our thoughts?No I don't, but if your private thoughts are discovered and contradict your public thoughts, people should know the truth.
Quote:No... what is private is not also public, which is where common decency steps in. Shell showed disregard for private space and violated Alei's by posting her private thoughts.Alei didn't show common decency. Why should Shell?
Quote:There was nothing admirable about what Shell did. It was shameful. Shell is the one with the slight power in this situation. The oness is upon her here to show more responsibility. At the moment the ball is on the other foot.Standing up to someone who constantly tries to harass you, both publicly and now privately is very admirable in my opinion. We obviously aren't going to agree over that.