(April 4, 2012 at 6:05 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(April 4, 2012 at 5:47 pm)elunico13 Wrote: Let me be more specific than. Where do YOU find justification to decide what is and isn't destructive behavior?
Really, it's quite simple. If human activity destroys a thing (e.g. habitat), then it would seem to be a simple deduction that said activity was destructive.
Too complex of a concept for you, perhaps?
Is that an absolute fact?
James Holmes acted consistent with what evolution teaches. He evolved from an animal, and when he murdered those people, He acted like one. You can't say he's wrong since evolution made him that way.