For me as an absurdist god is a side issue. Is there a meaning or is this all by chance? The introduction of a god into the question does not give any more or less meaning.
I can dominate the ant, but that does not provide the ant with meaning, it could serve my purposes, but if I do not have a meaning then the ants actions are ultimately futile.
I think there maybe a possibility that I could construct a meaning from chance occurrence (which is why I am not a Nihilist), but in that case my only meaning is from what is derived from me. in other words even if there were such a thing as a god its creation would be more important than it is.
Even if there were a god it could be no more than a distraction.
I can dominate the ant, but that does not provide the ant with meaning, it could serve my purposes, but if I do not have a meaning then the ants actions are ultimately futile.
I think there maybe a possibility that I could construct a meaning from chance occurrence (which is why I am not a Nihilist), but in that case my only meaning is from what is derived from me. in other words even if there were such a thing as a god its creation would be more important than it is.
Even if there were a god it could be no more than a distraction.
