RE: Fundamentalist Trekkies....
September 21, 2012 at 5:37 pm
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2012 at 5:41 pm by Reforged.)
(September 21, 2012 at 5:17 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote: Star wars one to three would have been better if there was less boring meetings and sitting and more Jedi vs Sith action.
1 to three explained how it was set up but 4 to 6 were better.
The need to make more a old republic (Jedi vs Sith (Darth Revan for example))
I like the New Star trek, it was better then the old ones and was more realistic (I don't care how many trekkies I offend, grow up) but I will always prefer Star Wars over Star Trek.
Meh. I think the first three were going to suck balls no matter what. George Lucas is a greedy moron.
The new star trek? Really? You're into the whole concept of time travel completely destroying the premise of every single star trek film and episode that came before and replacing them with films where fetuses take charge of the enterprise?
Just seems like a lazy way to reboot the whole franchise and rake in some more cash to me.
"That is not dead which can eternal lie and with strange aeons even death may die."
- Abdul Alhazred.
- Abdul Alhazred.
