My dumbass parents doubt evolution

[Welsh cake]

No, idiot. I don't need to prove the premises of arguments.

Yes, you fucking do, actually. You smug little arsewipe. >.>

You need to defeat them.

NO.

The default position is disbelief until there is until sufficient evidence provided in support of that claim. This being an ontological dispute. You haven't presented any evidence at all, except tired old invalid arguments, that have been debunked or discounted long since before you were even born.

But don't even bother wasting your time bringing new material, being an apatheist, you can never hope to present me with enough material that could ever make me care.

That's the way arguments work. Otherwise, you end in infinite regress of proving the proof.

Try actually looking up what "infinite regress" means before applying the term so flippantly in a debate, otherwise you come off as an ignorant buffoon in front of your audience.