(December 16, 2012 at 10:50 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: [quote='Al-Fatihah' pid='375096' dateline='1355668641']
I thought books are not reliable. To quote you before:
Quote:Books can be written in falsehood and with false witnesses, therefore they are not a reliable source of information.
Dictionaries are books. Collections of words. Double standard fallacy, on top of circular logic fallacy, appeal to theism fallacy [unintelligence cannot give rise to intelligence ergo intelligence must have given rise to intelligence ergo the appeal; the experiments that have proven it can have already been cited half a dozen times in this thread, I'm not wasting any further time on your ignorance to show them again]. Endless fallacies. Only one debunked here is you. As usual.
Response: Books are reliable when the author is proven credible. But in your case, you claim something is fact simple because a science book says so, with absolutely no logical evidence that the author is speaking truthfully. In other words, a prime example of a brainwashed atheist who accepts anything as a scientific fact, as long as it's mentioned in a book. Delusion at its best.