Atheist Idicoy

[Mister Agenda]

The arguments presented by Atheists are so illogical and hypocritical, that it's hard to imagine whether they are sane or not.

For example?

An atheist will deny or reject the teachings in religious scriptures and say that they are unsound or false because religious scriptures are made up of folklore and myths. They also state that saying a religious scripture is true because it says it's true is faulty logic.

Saying ANYTHING that is written is true because it says it is true is faulty logic.

But watch this. Ask any atheist about evoultion and what is there proof? They themselves refer to textbooks themselves as proof and claim that evolution is true for the same reasons why religious call their scriptures true. "Because it says so". That shows not only complete hypocrisy, but refutes the claim that evolution is true because according to atheists themselves, claiming something is true because it says it's true is faulty logic.

We don't only refer to textbooks. We can refer you to the papers they're based on. We can refer you to the scientists who did the work. We can direct you to fossil dig sites, genetic laboratories, and botanical and zoological fieldwork. The only thing we can't do is understand it for you.

It doesn't end there though. To defend that foolish claim, they say that it's not based on say so. They say that the science has been peer-reviewed, analyzed, and witnessed, observed and tested, so it's a fact.

That doesn't make it a fact, just well-supported. What makes it a fact is the accumulated evidence of well over a century.

But watch this. How do you know that it's been witnessed, peer-reviewed, and analyzed, observed and tested? "Because it says so". Hahah. They defend their faulty logic with the same faulty logic.

We have years of accumulated posts here. I dare you to find one where an atheist says they know the evidence has been witnessed, peer-reviewed, and analyzed, observed and tested 'because the source says so'. And EVEN if you found a profoundly stupid atheist to say something like that, it's still faulty logic, and it still applies to religious texts: a source saying it's true doesn't make it true.

Therefore, since all atheist claims and alleged evidence that evolution is true or God does not or may not exist is based on "because a book says so" and cannot even present evidence that the authors are speaking truthfully, then they have no logical reasoning to deny any religious scripture as truth when it's based on the same type of evidence for evolution as true, which is, "because a book says so".

Lots of theists accept the evidence that evolution is true, it's not an atheist theory, it's a scientific theory. However, if every atheist believed in it for illogical reasons, it wouldn't make believing the words of a religious text are true because they say they are, logical. It would just mean we're abusing logic as badly as you are.

The idiocy of atheists exposed.

At least you spelled 'idiocy' correctly that time.