RE: Gay couples in a Texas restaurant
February 26, 2013 at 7:24 pm
(This post was last modified: February 26, 2013 at 7:25 pm by Napoléon.)
(February 26, 2013 at 7:14 pm)Nobody Wrote: However, having that inclusion into the civil contract that is marriage, would entitle homosexuals the right to violate the first amendment rights of religions and their institutions, in the event those institutions (churches) refused to agree to preside over a homosexual marriage ceremony in the church.
Bullfuckingshit.
Religion does not have a monopoly on marriage. It is not something religion invented or owns. To say that it would violate first amendment rights, and insinuate that religious organisations have any rights over what a government grants to people as marriage, is down right fucking bat shit crazy.
I'd reply to more of your points but I have a habit of not being able to read enormous amounts of uneducated drivel.
