(February 26, 2013 at 7:24 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(February 26, 2013 at 7:14 pm)Nobody Wrote: However, having that inclusion into the civil contract that is marriage, would entitle homosexuals the right to violate the first amendment rights of religions and their institutions, in the event those institutions (churches) refused to agree to preside over a homosexual marriage ceremony in the church.
Bullfuckingshit.
Religion does not have a monopoly on marriage. It is not something religion invented or owns. To say that it would violate first amendment rights, and insinuate that religious organisations have any rights over what a government grants to people as marriage, is down right fucking bat shit crazy.
I'd reply to more of your points but I have a habit of not being able to read enormous amounts of uneducated drivel.
Fuggedaboudit Napolean. Haven't you figured it out yet? He is morally superior to you.
His moral code is the only correct one and you are a silly, morally deficient, cromagnon whiner if you can't see it.
If you don't know what true morality is and don't know how to stand up for your morals, just ask him, he'll be happy to put you on the right path.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein