RE: Physicallity and Undetectibility
June 19, 2013 at 6:21 pm
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2013 at 6:23 pm by Baalzebutt.)
(June 19, 2013 at 5:10 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(June 19, 2013 at 2:55 pm)Baalzebutt Wrote: But it also produces a problem. If the event is tested and turns out to have a naturalistic cause, what makes it distinguishable from a completely natural (even if it is statistically improbable) event?
Why is god required?
How can it not turn out to have a naturalistic cause? That makes no sense.
God (insert your alternative) is required to explain purpose.
So then the question becomes: How do you know god did it? How do you differentiate between a miracle and a statistically unlikely event?
(June 19, 2013 at 6:07 pm)Godschild Wrote: God is not testable He is Spirit, science can't test that. He created the universe and it's testable. God can heal people and it appear to be by conventional means, thus not appearing He did unless you're a believer. Aren't there cases of physical healing where doctors have no idea how it occurred, actually knowing what they did could not bring about the results. As far as I'm concerned the greatest miracle is salvation and science can not test that yet it occurs daily. Then those things that happen that have no scientific explanation, you will say we just do not understand yet but, in time we will. Really that seem like an arrogant assumption, no one could know if the answer will come in the future. So somethings God does is testable yet would seem to be accomplished by man, other things God does will never be testable by man, yet will not be accepted by those who do not know Him.
I will ask you the same question: How do you know god did it? How do you differentiate between a miracle and a statistically unlikely event?
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." -Einstein
