Quote:what i know it is not necessary to have evidence to prove existence of things
True as far as it goes. But belief in God isn't simply believing in God without evidence, it is believing in God in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
To paraphrase LaPlace, there is no need for a God hypothesis to explain ANYthing.
While it is true that I cannot show a blind person the colour red, I can easily (fairly easily, anyroad) explain to her wavelengths and diffraction pattern, and explain to her that when certain wavelengths scatter in a certain way, we call the resulting phenomenon 'red'.
But this is pretty far removed from Godism. For myself, I would not require physical evidence for God - I'd settle for an unassailable logical argument for the existence of God. So now, it's your turn. Complete the following sentence in a manner which will convince anyone of your point (use as many words as you like):
'God must exist because...'
Have a lovely day.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
